<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OmniWebsite 7.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.omnigroup.com/2007/06/07/omniwebsite-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.omnigroup.com/2007/06/07/omniwebsite-20/</link>
	<description>The Omni Mouth: standing outside your bedroom window playing \"In Your Eyes\" since 2006.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob Record</title>
		<link>http://blog.omnigroup.com/2007/06/07/omniwebsite-20/#comment-61953</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Record</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 12:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.omnigroup.com/2007/06/07/omniwebsite-20/#comment-61953</guid>
		<description>Hi guys...

Good effort on the new site but I'm afraid it doesn't get my vote.

I feel the typography chosen for the titles of the apps wasn't great - letters are hard to make out, as I think the font has kerning problems ..

The whole page also looks way too small in my opinion. I much preferred the previous layout with the apps lined up on the left side.

I can't remember exactly what the site looked like without using archive.org but it seems a lot plainer and a little less inviting now.

Hope you don't mind me saying about this, just think you guys deserve something special as your app design is always first class.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi guys&#8230;</p>
<p>Good effort on the new site but I&#8217;m afraid it doesn&#8217;t get my vote.</p>
<p>I feel the typography chosen for the titles of the apps wasn&#8217;t great - letters are hard to make out, as I think the font has kerning problems ..</p>
<p>The whole page also looks way too small in my opinion. I much preferred the previous layout with the apps lined up on the left side.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t remember exactly what the site looked like without using archive.org but it seems a lot plainer and a little less inviting now.</p>
<p>Hope you don&#8217;t mind me saying about this, just think you guys deserve something special as your app design is always first class.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rohey</title>
		<link>http://blog.omnigroup.com/2007/06/07/omniwebsite-20/#comment-61755</link>
		<dc:creator>Rohey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 19:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.omnigroup.com/2007/06/07/omniwebsite-20/#comment-61755</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://safarissues.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Safari: iApple + iGoogle = iHappy&lt;/a&gt;

Standards, open source and a new new way to get WebKit into the open?

Omniweb 5.5.4


As a paid for browser using the WebKit tools... I would have expected the GREAT and WONDERFUL Omni group to update their 
WebKit integration of Omniweb... It is outdated, and even the new and buggy Safari is operating better on lots of Web 2.0 sites than OW.


Please OW group! Give us the Best experience we came to expect...



PS - You have the BEST browser in the world, don't let Steve's stupid comments about Safari... intimidate you... ;-)


&lt;a href="http://safarissues.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;To be continued...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://safarissues.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">Safari: iApple + iGoogle = iHappy</a></p>
<p>Standards, open source and a new new way to get WebKit into the open?</p>
<p>Omniweb 5.5.4</p>
<p>As a paid for browser using the WebKit tools&#8230; I would have expected the GREAT and WONDERFUL Omni group to update their<br />
WebKit integration of Omniweb&#8230; It is outdated, and even the new and buggy Safari is operating better on lots of Web 2.0 sites than OW.</p>
<p>Please OW group! Give us the Best experience we came to expect&#8230;</p>
<p>PS - You have the BEST browser in the world, don&#8217;t let Steve&#8217;s stupid comments about Safari&#8230; intimidate you&#8230; <img src='http://blog.omnigroup.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><a href="http://safarissues.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">To be continued&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Fontcuberta</title>
		<link>http://blog.omnigroup.com/2007/06/07/omniwebsite-20/#comment-61572</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Fontcuberta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.omnigroup.com/2007/06/07/omniwebsite-20/#comment-61572</guid>
		<description>Would sure love to be viewing it with OmniWeb 6.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would sure love to be viewing it with OmniWeb 6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kev</title>
		<link>http://blog.omnigroup.com/2007/06/07/omniwebsite-20/#comment-61564</link>
		<dc:creator>kev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.omnigroup.com/2007/06/07/omniwebsite-20/#comment-61564</guid>
		<description>are people really that pathetic? Who cares if a site uses frames or not! If frames are a problem for someone then they have to be using some really archaic system that needs updating. Ridiculous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>are people really that pathetic? Who cares if a site uses frames or not! If frames are a problem for someone then they have to be using some really archaic system that needs updating. Ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rory</title>
		<link>http://blog.omnigroup.com/2007/06/07/omniwebsite-20/#comment-61502</link>
		<dc:creator>Rory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 08:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.omnigroup.com/2007/06/07/omniwebsite-20/#comment-61502</guid>
		<description>You guys really should consider hiring a professional web designer to do your site (I assume this is an internal job). Frankly the typography sucks, nothing lines up with anything else because you don't specify a page width and your home page looks totally different to the rest of the site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys really should consider hiring a professional web designer to do your site (I assume this is an internal job). Frankly the typography sucks, nothing lines up with anything else because you don&#8217;t specify a page width and your home page looks totally different to the rest of the site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy Weir</title>
		<link>http://blog.omnigroup.com/2007/06/07/omniwebsite-20/#comment-61333</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy Weir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 23:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.omnigroup.com/2007/06/07/omniwebsite-20/#comment-61333</guid>
		<description>It's much nicer....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s much nicer&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William</title>
		<link>http://blog.omnigroup.com/2007/06/07/omniwebsite-20/#comment-61306</link>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 18:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.omnigroup.com/2007/06/07/omniwebsite-20/#comment-61306</guid>
		<description>Ah, I see it now. If you increase the font size, yes, weird things happen on the front page. There's also the navigation menu wrapping problem on the application pages if your window is narrow.

Both of these problems have been noted, and we'll get to work on fixing them. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, I see it now. If you increase the font size, yes, weird things happen on the front page. There&#8217;s also the navigation menu wrapping problem on the application pages if your window is narrow.</p>
<p>Both of these problems have been noted, and we&#8217;ll get to work on fixing them. <img src='http://blog.omnigroup.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnny0</title>
		<link>http://blog.omnigroup.com/2007/06/07/omniwebsite-20/#comment-61287</link>
		<dc:creator>johnny0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 16:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.omnigroup.com/2007/06/07/omniwebsite-20/#comment-61287</guid>
		<description>You also get the wrapping when using Rather Large Fonts in Safari, in addition to Rather Narrow Windows. 

At first I thought it was some sort of avant garde layout technique:

0[]%!            The Omni
         Group

"Why, yes, I work for The Group...  The Omni Group."  

Yeah, I could see Joel saying that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You also get the wrapping when using Rather Large Fonts in Safari, in addition to Rather Narrow Windows. </p>
<p>At first I thought it was some sort of avant garde layout technique:</p>
<p>0[]%!            The Omni<br />
         Group</p>
<p>&#8220;Why, yes, I work for The Group&#8230;  The Omni Group.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Yeah, I could see Joel saying that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelsang Norbu</title>
		<link>http://blog.omnigroup.com/2007/06/07/omniwebsite-20/#comment-61274</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelsang Norbu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 13:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.omnigroup.com/2007/06/07/omniwebsite-20/#comment-61274</guid>
		<description>Hi Guys - do you want visual feedback? Ignore this if not. Whilst all the visual elements on the front page are attactive and franky beautiful in their clarity, I can't help feeling the elements have all been squashed together to choking - dispite the nice stuff due to a lack of space above and below elements such as the news flashes it looks really busy (in this respect alone it was much better before). Also in comparsion to the font sizes elsewhere the news flash text is ugly big, which again crushes things together. I'm really sorry if this is out of order, its all subjective anyway. Hope you don't want to hit me with a stick! I'm one of those anoying ex-graphic designers that can't stop scratching an itch. College made me a monster!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Guys - do you want visual feedback? Ignore this if not. Whilst all the visual elements on the front page are attactive and franky beautiful in their clarity, I can&#8217;t help feeling the elements have all been squashed together to choking - dispite the nice stuff due to a lack of space above and below elements such as the news flashes it looks really busy (in this respect alone it was much better before). Also in comparsion to the font sizes elsewhere the news flash text is ugly big, which again crushes things together. I&#8217;m really sorry if this is out of order, its all subjective anyway. Hope you don&#8217;t want to hit me with a stick! I&#8217;m one of those anoying ex-graphic designers that can&#8217;t stop scratching an itch. College made me a monster!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Case</title>
		<link>http://blog.omnigroup.com/2007/06/07/omniwebsite-20/#comment-61261</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Case</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 11:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.omnigroup.com/2007/06/07/omniwebsite-20/#comment-61261</guid>
		<description>Ohhh.  Maybe the problem is that we're all using the internal alpha builds of OmniWeb 5.6?  (At least I know I am.)

We'll check it out, thanks again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ohhh.  Maybe the problem is that we&#8217;re all using the internal alpha builds of OmniWeb 5.6?  (At least I know I am.)</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll check it out, thanks again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
