<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The state of OmniWeb</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.omnigroup.com/2006/04/12/the-state-of-omniweb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.omnigroup.com/2006/04/12/the-state-of-omniweb/</link>
	<description>The Omni Mouth: standing outside your bedroom window playing \"In Your Eyes\" since 2006.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 05:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Autour du Web 2.0 (3) at Prise de notes sans prise de tête</title>
		<link>http://blog.omnigroup.com/2006/04/12/the-state-of-omniweb/#comment-13462</link>
		<dc:creator>Autour du Web 2.0 (3) at Prise de notes sans prise de tête</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 00:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.omnigroup.com/2006/04/12/the-state-of-omniweb/#comment-13462</guid>
		<description>[...] • OmniWeb 5.5 (Sneaky Peek) : OmniWeb le navigateur historique sur MacOs X poursuit son bonhomme de chemin. Une version 5.5 est en chantier. La version bêta devrait tout soudain être mis à disposition des internautes. Mais il est déjà possible pour les plus courageux de se lancer avec la version &#8220;Sneaky Peek&#8221;. Cette version paraît apporter un élément qui jusqu&#8217;à maintenant ressemblait au défaut majeur de ce navigateur : la rapidité d&#8217;affichage des pages. Pour ceux qui désirent personnaliser l&#8217;usage de son navigateur, ce sera peut-être une bonne affaire. A noter qu&#8217;il sera nécessaire de s&#8217;inscrire à leurs forums pour disposer de la clé d&#8217;accès à l&#8217;installateur du programme. Via le blog d&#8217;Omnigroup. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] • OmniWeb 5.5 (Sneaky Peek) : OmniWeb le navigateur historique sur MacOs X poursuit son bonhomme de chemin. Une version 5.5 est en chantier. La version bêta devrait tout soudain être mis à disposition des internautes. Mais il est déjà possible pour les plus courageux de se lancer avec la version &#8220;Sneaky Peek&#8221;. Cette version paraît apporter un élément qui jusqu&#8217;à maintenant ressemblait au défaut majeur de ce navigateur : la rapidité d&#8217;affichage des pages. Pour ceux qui désirent personnaliser l&#8217;usage de son navigateur, ce sera peut-être une bonne affaire. A noter qu&#8217;il sera nécessaire de s&#8217;inscrire à leurs forums pour disposer de la clé d&#8217;accès à l&#8217;installateur du programme. Via le blog d&#8217;Omnigroup. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Where Are The Wise Men? &#187; Blog Archive &#187; To Safari or not to Safari?</title>
		<link>http://blog.omnigroup.com/2006/04/12/the-state-of-omniweb/#comment-1906</link>
		<dc:creator>Where Are The Wise Men? &#187; Blog Archive &#187; To Safari or not to Safari?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 00:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.omnigroup.com/2006/04/12/the-state-of-omniweb/#comment-1906</guid>
		<description>[...] I think middle two issues stem from using Rosetta. The features almost outweigh all of them &#8212; except the performance. Well, and the crashing. Maybe worth another look when 5.5 is out. Yep, I know there is a public beta, but I&#8217;m going to wait for the real thing. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I think middle two issues stem from using Rosetta. The features almost outweigh all of them &#8212; except the performance. Well, and the crashing. Maybe worth another look when 5.5 is out. Yep, I know there is a public beta, but I&#8217;m going to wait for the real thing. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Where Are The Wise Men? &#187; Blog Archive &#187; To Safari or not to Safari?</title>
		<link>http://blog.omnigroup.com/2006/04/12/the-state-of-omniweb/#comment-760</link>
		<dc:creator>Where Are The Wise Men? &#187; Blog Archive &#187; To Safari or not to Safari?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 17:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.omnigroup.com/2006/04/12/the-state-of-omniweb/#comment-760</guid>
		<description>[...] I think middle two issues stem from using Rosetta. The features almost outweigh all of them &#8212; except the performance. Well, and the crashing. Maybe worth another look when 5.5 is out. Yep, I know there is a public beta, but I&#8217;m going to wait for the real thing. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I think middle two issues stem from using Rosetta. The features almost outweigh all of them &mdash; except the performance. Well, and the crashing. Maybe worth another look when 5.5 is out. Yep, I know there is a public beta, but I&#8217;m going to wait for the real thing. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emanuel Ravelli</title>
		<link>http://blog.omnigroup.com/2006/04/12/the-state-of-omniweb/#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator>Emanuel Ravelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 17:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.omnigroup.com/2006/04/12/the-state-of-omniweb/#comment-241</guid>
		<description>OmniWeb has always been "sexy," but can it cook properly?

Unless the bugs in the current version are fixed, the application renders more quickly, control of Flash and ads is more intuitive, and it stops crashing, I'm getting a divorce lawyer.

Adding more sexy features without fixing the current problems is putting lipstick on a pig.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OmniWeb has always been &#8220;sexy,&#8221; but can it cook properly?</p>
<p>Unless the bugs in the current version are fixed, the application renders more quickly, control of Flash and ads is more intuitive, and it stops crashing, I&#8217;m getting a divorce lawyer.</p>
<p>Adding more sexy features without fixing the current problems is putting lipstick on a pig.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach</title>
		<link>http://blog.omnigroup.com/2006/04/12/the-state-of-omniweb/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 07:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.omnigroup.com/2006/04/12/the-state-of-omniweb/#comment-195</guid>
		<description>This looks very sexy. I look forward to switching back to OmniWeb when this becomes available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks very sexy. I look forward to switching back to OmniWeb when this becomes available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arbited &#187; OmniWeb: I want to like it</title>
		<link>http://blog.omnigroup.com/2006/04/12/the-state-of-omniweb/#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator>Arbited &#187; OmniWeb: I want to like it</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 22:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.omnigroup.com/2006/04/12/the-state-of-omniweb/#comment-188</guid>
		<description>[...] There is reason to take heart, however: a new version of OmniWeb will be in public beta in a few weeks and it&#8217;s based on Apple&#8217;s WebKit rendering engine. (That means OmniWeb will display web pages the same way that Safari does.) This will be a nice step forward, and could make OmniWeb a viable option for me. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There is reason to take heart, however: a new version of OmniWeb will be in public beta in a few weeks and it&#8217;s based on Apple&#8217;s WebKit rendering engine. (That means OmniWeb will display web pages the same way that Safari does.) This will be a nice step forward, and could make OmniWeb a viable option for me. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie</title>
		<link>http://blog.omnigroup.com/2006/04/12/the-state-of-omniweb/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 06:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.omnigroup.com/2006/04/12/the-state-of-omniweb/#comment-168</guid>
		<description>I'd like to see some less intrusive toolbar icons.  The interface feels cluttered and the loud colours in the toolbar icons don't help...  Something more like Camino would be an improvement.  Looking forward to giving it a whirl nonetheless!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to see some less intrusive toolbar icons.  The interface feels cluttered and the loud colours in the toolbar icons don&#8217;t help&#8230;  Something more like Camino would be an improvement.  Looking forward to giving it a whirl nonetheless!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lars</title>
		<link>http://blog.omnigroup.com/2006/04/12/the-state-of-omniweb/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>Lars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 21:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.omnigroup.com/2006/04/12/the-state-of-omniweb/#comment-106</guid>
		<description>I'd like to see OmniWeb to become a swiss knife for Webdevs with all the features one needs to debug html and Javascript.

Some ideas:

- show the DOM name of objects in the webinspector palette
- also show html/DOM which was changed/added by javascript (important for AJAX debugging)
- stepping thru Javascript code would be great
- some sort of http traffic watcher like "live http headers" for firefox ( http://livehttpheaders.mozdev.org/ ) would ease form debugging a lot.

regards, Lars</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to see OmniWeb to become a swiss knife for Webdevs with all the features one needs to debug html and Javascript.</p>
<p>Some ideas:</p>
<p>- show the DOM name of objects in the webinspector palette<br />
- also show html/DOM which was changed/added by javascript (important for AJAX debugging)<br />
- stepping thru Javascript code would be great<br />
- some sort of http traffic watcher like &#8220;live http headers&#8221; for firefox ( <a href="http://livehttpheaders.mozdev.org/" rel="nofollow">http://livehttpheaders.mozdev.org/</a> ) would ease form debugging a lot.</p>
<p>regards, Lars</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://blog.omnigroup.com/2006/04/12/the-state-of-omniweb/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 21:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.omnigroup.com/2006/04/12/the-state-of-omniweb/#comment-103</guid>
		<description>The only area where the current version of OmniWeb is seriously lacking is ad filtering. (Want to know how to do it right? Check out iCab.) Hoping to see some major improvements in that area in version 5.5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only area where the current version of OmniWeb is seriously lacking is ad filtering. (Want to know how to do it right? Check out iCab.) Hoping to see some major improvements in that area in version 5.5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy Weir</title>
		<link>http://blog.omnigroup.com/2006/04/12/the-state-of-omniweb/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy Weir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 18:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.omnigroup.com/2006/04/12/the-state-of-omniweb/#comment-98</guid>
		<description>Looking forward to the public beta immensely.  I work online, spending at least 6 hours work and around 2 leisure a day (jesus help me).  Omniweb was worth forking out for but the speed issue has become a real problem.  That and having to use Firefox for certain sites.  Bring it on...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking forward to the public beta immensely.  I work online, spending at least 6 hours work and around 2 leisure a day (jesus help me).  Omniweb was worth forking out for but the speed issue has become a real problem.  That and having to use Firefox for certain sites.  Bring it on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
